IMPACT

VALUE CREATION MODEL

We position ourselves as an “enabler” that indirectly contributes to creating impact for patients—namely, fulfilling unmet medical needs and extending healthy lifespans around the world—by providing essential support for the business growth of pharmaceutical companies. Leveraging this unique role, we aim to realize our purpose by addressing challenges within the pharmaceutical industry. We recognize key challenges in the industry, such as declining drug discovery productivity coupled with rising costs, an increasing number of medical needs that cannot be addressed by traditional small-molecule drugs, and the fragmentation of drug discovery technologies and expertise. By utilizing the assets and knowledge held within our corporate group, we strive to solve these issues through our business activities. This process is summarized in the value creation model (logic model) shown below.

Key Features of Our Logic Model

1. Focus on Challenges and Outcomes :

We characterize our business by its role as an “enabler” that indirectly contributes to patient impact by supporting the business growth of pharmaceutical companies. By leveraging this unique position, we aim to ultimately contribute to patients and realize our purpose through addressing challenges faced by the pharmaceutical industry as key outcomes.

2. Incorporation of ESG Perspectives for Sustainable Value Creation :

Our group has identified not only “generating social impact through business” as a key materiality for sustainable corporate value creation, but also ESG-related elements such as “promoting diverse human capital” and “strengthening our management foundation.” In our logic model, we integrate and visualize these aspects to express the resilience of our value creation process.

3. Activities and Outputs :

Particularly in comparison with conventional CRO businesses, our strength lies in being solution-oriented. Within the flow from activities to outputs and outcomes, our model illustrates the problem-solving process aimed at generating new drug candidates.

MATERIALITY MANAGEMENT

We aim to generate a lasting impact on society by continuously implementing our value creation model (logic model). In recent years, the pharmaceutical development process has evolved from a vertically integrated model to a horizontally specialized model. As pharmaceutical companies increasingly utilize external resources, the outsourcing market for CROs and CDMOs is expected to expand rapidly over the next decade. Against this backdrop, we identified the key risks and opportunities for sustainable corporate value creation and defined our material issues (“materiality”) under three main categories and nine subcategories.

1. Generating Social Impact Through Business Growth

We aim for a management approach in which our business itself contributes to social impact. To promote impact-driven management, we have defined the following two outcomes as materiality subcategories. Specifically, cross-functional collaboration—including business operations and sales—supports the collection of various financial and non-financial metrics related to these outcomes, which are then visualized and quantified to further evolve the business.

1.1 Contribution to the Generation of New Drug Candidates
1.2 Streamlining the Drug Discovery Process

2. Empowering Diverse Talent for Long-Term Impact Growth

We strive to hire and develop talent capable of understanding and solving complex challenges in drug discovery from diverse perspectives, thereby enhancing our competitiveness. To this end, we have established the following three subcategories of materiality and are promoting HR initiatives accordingly.

2.1 Recruitment and Placement of Diverse Talent
2.2 Growth Support That Fosters Individual Strengths
2.3 A Work Environment That Encourages Both Comfort and Engagement

3. Strengthening the Management Foundation to Generate Impact

We have defined the following four subcategories as part of the essential management foundation we must build, and have integrated them into our corporate management practices.

3.1 Responsible Provision of Products and Services
3.2 Environmental Initiatives
3.3 Human Rights and Supply Chain
3.4 Stakeholder & Impact Governance

These materiality items serve as the core of our impact-driven management. Therefore, agendas related to them are treated as critical matters. We regularly assess whether the items remain appropriate and establish metrics to measure progress, ensuring ongoing and effective implementation.

The identification of material issues and the development of corresponding indicators have been the result of years of deliberation involving directors and executive officers of Axcelead as well as directors and executives from our group companies.

To date, we have made progress primarily from the perspective of “creating social impact”, including the formulation and disclosure of our logic model, the development of materiality indicators, and the establishment of a system to collect non-financial indicators, including those related to materiality. Specifically, we have identified non-financial indicators that effectively reflect our strengths and uniqueness, appointed dedicated managers for each business and thematic area, and built a system in which these managers report on progress both quantitatively and qualitatively on a quarterly basis.

From the perspectives of “empowering diverse talent” and “strengthening the management foundation”, we have formulated a human rights policy and begun monitoring employee data. Additionally, we have established guidelines for supply chain behavior and a policy on animal testing, thereby organizing and visualizing the foundational principles for promoting relevant initiatives.

Furthermore, through the Risk Management and Compliance Promotion Committee, we identify risk-related issues, make decisions on their appropriate management, and ensure compliance through the establishment and maintenance of the necessary governance systems.

Click here for “the Axcelead Group Human Rights Policy”
Click here for “the Axcelead Group Supplier Code of Conduct”
Click here for “the Axcelead Group Animal Testing Policy”

To sustainably generate social impact, our corporate group believes that in addition to financial indicators, the understanding and monitoring of non-financial indicators is essential. Accordingly, we have established specific indicators for each of the three key – categories and nine sub – categories of our materiality. Below are the actual results for fiscal year 2024.

Materiality – Key CategoriesMateriality – SubcategoriesDescription / Initiatives UndertakenManagement Indicator / KPIActual Value (FY2024)
Creating Social ImpactContributing to the Creation of New Drug CandidatesPromote the Launch of New DrugsCumulative # of Patent Applications Filed by Clients (Involving Our Employees as Inventors)19*1
# of Approved mRNA Drugs in Japan Involving Our Group1/5*2
Streamlining the Drug Discovery ProcessAchieve Speed That Meets Client ExpectationsClient Satisfaction with Study Duration (5-Point Scale)4.5+*3
Success of Diverse EmployeesRecruitment and Placement of Diverse TalentEnhance Recruitment of Talent with Strong Project Leadership and Management Skills Who Can Appropriately Address Complex Drug Discovery Challenges from Diverse Perspectives, in Order to Support Global Expansion and Innovation, and Strengthen Our Competitive Advantage.Percentage of Employees with Advanced Degrees (Master’s or Higher)48%*4
Percentage of International Talent (with 3+ Years of Experience Abroad or in a Multicultural Environment)5%*5
Growth Support That Fosters Individual StrengthsProvide Growth Opportunities Through Hands-On Experiences and Learning Environments to Empower Individuals to Take Ownership of Their Careers.# of Career-Specific Interviews Conducted254 times*6
A Work Environment That Is Both Supportive and FulfillingPromote a Vibrant Work Environment and Culture by Supporting Work-Life Balance and the Active Participation of Diverse Talent.Retention Rate of Employees with Tenure of Three Years or More82%*7
*Reinforcement of Business InfrastructureProvision of Responsible Products and ServicesRespect Animal WelfarePercentage of Animal Experiments Conducted in Compliance with AAALAC Standards100%*8
Ensure Rigorous Safety Management of Products and Manufacturing ProcessesClient Satisfaction with Quality of Deliverables (5-Point Scale)4.4+*3
Comply with Laws, Regulations, and Compliance Requirements# of Serious Compliance Violations Related to Products and Services0 cases per year*9
Considering EnvironmentAddress Global Climate Change IssuesGreenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1 + 2/3)6,494t / 21,223t*10
Human Rights and Supply Chain ManagementAppropriately Manage Supplier Relationships Across the Supply ChainImplementation of Supplier Assessments1 time per year*11
Protect Workers’ Rights and Prevent Harassment and DiscriminationDeployment of Human Rights Education Programs1 time per year*12
Stakeholders and Impact GovernanceIncorporate Impact-Oriented Thinking into Management# of Board Resolutions and Executive Committee Discussions on Impact-Driven Management Agendas3 times per year・
6 times per year
*13
  1. The cumulative number since 2018 of patent applications published in patent office databases in various countries in which employees involved in our group’s drug discovery support business are listed as inventors.
  2. The number (numerator) of domestically approved mRNA pharmaceuticals in which our group’s name is included as the developer or co-developer (organization), out of the total number (denominator) of approved mRNA pharmaceuticals in Japan.
    (Reference: https://www.nihs.go.jp/mtgt/pdf/section3-2.pdf)
  3. The average score from 102 client companies that responded to the FY2024 survey. This refers to satisfaction levels (on a 5-point scale) regarding “study period” and “quality of deliverables.”
  4. Out of 529 group employees, 257 hold a master’s degree or higher (Axcelead, 24; ADDP, 145; ATWP, 57; and ARCALIS, 31). Although ARCALIS closes its fiscal year in December, all employee-related data is standardized as of the end of March.
  5. The percentage of employees who are foreign nationals, naturalized citizens, or have more than three years of experience studying or working abroad.
  6. The total number of career-focused interviews conducted during FY2024 (excluding performance evaluations and routine 1-on-1 meetings).
  7. The average value across the three companies, excluding ATWP (established within one year): Axcelead (87.1%), ADDP (81.7%), ARCALIS (91.7%).
  8. Only applies to ADDP in FY2024. All experiments at ADDP are automatically conducted in compliance with AAALAC standards.
  9. The number of compliance violations related to products and services escalated to the Risk Management and Compliance Promotion Committee, which holds meetings quarterly at Axcelead.
  10. Calculation began in FY2023. In FY2024, new data was obtained from Axcelead, ADDP, ATWP, and ARCALIS. For four smaller subsidiaries other than overseas entities, FY2023 data was reused considering their lower impact.
  11. In the drug discovery support business, surveys were conducted for all critical research subcontractors (accounting for approximately 20% of transaction value, 27 companies). In the CDMO business, internal evaluations were conducted for 12 suppliers covering approximately 80% of transaction value.
  12. Each company conducts at least one human rights training session annually (Axcelead and ADDP, once; ATWP and ARCALIS, twice).
  13. The number of times impact-driven management was included as an agenda item out of all 20 Board of Directors meetings and 45 Executive Officers’ Meetings held in FY2024.

Going forward, we will regularly monitor these indicators and work toward setting target values in order to further advance our impact-driven management.

GOVERNANCE SYSTEMS

We place strong emphasis on sustainability as a key driver of our group’s medium- to long-term value creation. Accordingly, we have appointed an Executive Officer in charge of promoting impact-driven management. Important matters related to impact-driven management are deliberated by the Executive Officers’ Meeting and then submitted to the Board of Directors for approval and reporting. Through this process, the Board of Directors plays a supervisory role over the sustainability management of our group. At the corporate level, we have established and operate several committees; the Board of Directors, the Nomination and Compensation Committees, the Audit Committee, the Risk Management and Compliance Promotion Committee, and the Executive Officers’ Meeting.

As our group is currently in a growth stage where swift decision-making is critical, we have chosen not to establish a separate Sustainability Committee for discussing sustainability, impact, and ESG-related issues. Instead, relevant matters are assessed and analyzed by responsible personnel and then discussed within the Executive Officers’ Meeting and the Board of Directors. From the perspective of stakeholder and impact governance, we have designated the number of impact-related agenda discussions held by the Board of Directors as a KPI, thereby emphasizing the strategic importance of impact-driven management. Additionally, to enhance the expertise of the Executive Officers’ Meeting in sustainability, impact, and ESG matters, we have appointed external experts in these fields as advisors to provide guidance and insights.

    PAGE TOP